I would love to contribute here more often, but the contempt in which I hold the Cairns Post means that I really can’t be bothered reading it, let alone wasting money buying it.
But every now and then something happens that you might either witness or have a bit of knowledge about, and you therefore might go online (or borrow a copy off some fool that bought one) and check to see how news was delivered to the masses.
Lets look at an example as it appears online at 1315 on 18 July (noted in case it gets corrected and Tricia arcs up about it)
Sugar load spills in Tully street
Julie Lightfoot
Saturday, July 18, 2009
© The Cairns Post
TONNES of sugar was scattered across Tully’s main street yesterday after a collision between a freight train and a semi-trailer at a rail level crossing.
The 1km-long freight train was travelling south when it collided with the rear of the truck’s trailer at the town’s main entrance.
The crash caused the truck’s rig to flip and spill its sugar cargo on to the road.
Emergency crews rushed to Butler St near the Bruce Highway at 4.50pm yesterday.
Both drivers escaped uninjured from the crash, which happened at a crossing with no lights.
It took crews nearly four hours to clean up the mess before the road reopened.
Tully Sugar Mill boss John King was unavailable for comment last night.
Innisfail Police District Insp David Tucker said the circumstances of the crash was still under police investigation.
The crossing is one of 66 singled out across the state by Queensland Rail to have boom gates installed.
In the scheme of things, the story is no world shattering event (except perhaps if you happen to be the idiot in the truck, one of the train drivers, clean up crew, or customer waiting for his delayed freight). But it serves as a reminder to simply not trust anything written or published by the hacks at our local rag.
The bit that got me was “which happened at a crossing with no lights” by which I presume to refer to those of the flashing kind that protect railway level crossings. I actually don’t see the reason to report that information at all, because all legal level crossings have various forms of protection that only require simple compliance thereof, in which to avoid violent contact with trains. However, the statement is stunningly inaccurate and takes nothing more time consuming than a check on Googles excellent streetview to see that the crossing does in fact have flashing lights.
In light of recent tragic events at rail crossings, the hysteria that has been whipped over these death trap level crossings (usually by the road transport industry who tries to deflect fault from their ‘professional drivers’, and of course the meeja), and the money that QR has spent on their driver education campaign, makes this relatively minor error in reporting inexcusable.
Oh, and a 1 km long train? Don’t think so. Where did you dig that one up from Julie?
Tags: level crossing, no research, rail