24
Jun

Biased Coverage

   Posted by: concernedincairns   in The Cairns Post

What I can’t believe is the bloody one sided attitude of the Cairns Post’s coverage of the Mayor.  It’s not hard to see what is going on, but everyone is going along for the ride.  Even when taking a proactive, self-funded step to stay in touch with her constituents, she gets a sly compliment at best.

The Cairns Post continues it’s attacks on the mayor, and the council.  Note Saturday’s condescending headline: “Website does the trick – Val’s a good stick,” casting aspersions on her new website – local web designer too I see, good one Val.  Most media savvy politicians have sites these days so it’s not as if it’s something new.

Then onto the editorial where the new editor slips into the ways of his predecessor with this little gem.  The Comms manager has apparently ordered some display material that, “featured one of the mayor’s favourite colours.” The mayor probably wouldn’t have a clue what operational things the manager is up to but Andrew has to have a go on behalf of the ratepayer.  We had higher hopes for you Andrew.

And finally, put the boot into council by running a point of view comment by an “old”Cairns  Events manager who’s got her nose out of joint because she’s missed out on getting on board with the new Festival Cairns which sounds a helluva lot more exciting that last years unwieldy concoction of unrelated events.  I’ll be rolling up for Geoffrey Yunupingu and the Saltwater band in a free concert after the new look parade this year.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 24th, 2009 at 8:04 am and is filed under The Cairns Post. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 comments so far

Ian Turp
 1 

Ha! I have to agree, I can’t believe that the Cairns post is SO hard up for something to print about Val that they ACTUALLY RUN A STORY ABOUT COMMENTS on their stories!!!

Whaat? Now, the comments left on a news blog have become a story in their own right ?

Journalistic integrity? Where is it. Most of the comments are questionable, some I suspect are downright wrong. One commenter suggests that the mayor would be updating the site in her own time… She has publicly stated that the site has been funded by herself. Doofus.

That the Cairns Post allows all views to be aired – fair enough. That they give a second headline and story to this rubbish is unacceptable. Fair cop people.

June 24th, 2009 at 8:12 am
Niko
 2 

There’s nothing particularly special about Val’s website. Don’t get me wrong, it’s informative which is a step up from the lack of direct communication from her… but this is something that a bunch of other pollies and businessfolk have gotten into already.

The Post article is pretty stupid though and the comments they’re basing their ‘facts’ off are comments off their own website, censored for their own views. I’ve tried commenting on cairns.com.au before and unless I agree with the Post, it doesn’t get published.

It’s a sad day that a newspaper thinks their own filtered comments are statistic worthy.

June 24th, 2009 at 4:58 pm
Chris W
 3 

Ha indeed. Next thing they’ll be doing an article on the SMS messages. Don’t you remember they did an article on Val’s Facebook page too. Give the Post journos some sympathy though. They have to think up stories EVERY day so it’s hard to be original. You guys only come up with something every couple of weeks.

June 24th, 2009 at 9:44 pm
Ian Turp
 4 

Niko said: “It’s a sad day that a newspaper thinks their own filtered comments are statistic worthy.” and that has given me an idea for another story…

I will do some research and get back to you – Thanks Niko !

June 25th, 2009 at 9:03 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment